Senior Leadership Northeast Minutes May 18, 2010

The May 18, 2010 meeting of Senior Leadership Northeast was convened at the Colleyville Chamber of Commerce building at 9:00 AM by Chairman Ed Havran.

 

Sunny Meeks welcomed the group and discussed the upcoming City Slickers event.  She encouraged everyone to come and listen to the good band that was going to be playing.

 

There were fifteen (15) individuals present representing nine (9) Northeast Tarrant County cities.

 

Rep. Vicki Truitt was the speaker.  Topic was ObamaCare. The following meeting notes submitted by Mitzi Long, Rep. Vicki Truitt's office:

 

We are still trying to figure this out, although the latest estimate is somewhere in the neighborhood of $2.7B per year.  The national health insurance bill expands eligibility for Medicaid.  On the one hand, we know that will cost at least $2.7 billion more a year starting in 2014, and could be as much as $4 billion more a year.  On the other hand many of these people who will qualify for Medicaid are already receiving health care through county-based indigent services.  Theoretically there would be an offset, but no one knows for sure how well that offset would work. 

 

We really don’t know how we will be able to pay for these services.  That is why the state is challenging the legislation in court.  The basis of the lawsuit is challenging the legality of the federal government requiring a Texan to buy something the citizen neither wants or feels he needs.  If the legal challenge prevails, it could overturn the whole bill or only parts of it. 

 

Summary of the provisions of the bill are available from Kaiser Family Foundation website at: http://www.kff.org/healthreform/sidebyside.cfm

 

Attorney General Abbott has joined his colleagues from 13 other states in filing a constitutional challenge to ObamaCare, the health care takeover bill that the Democrats passed against the objections of most Americans. Attorney General Abbott's lawsuit could spell the end of ObamaCare.

Show Attorney General Abbott that you support him by signing a petition, GO TO: (http://www.texasgop.org/inner.asp?z=650  at the Republican Party of Texas website.

 

Some ask about Nullification. Mr. GREG HOLLOWAY, a Lawyer and Founder of the Austin Tea Party Patriots, says, “Nullification is like shooting a water pistol at a forest fire. There's a lot of other ways, if someone finds a federal law to be inappropriate, to address that.

 

Among those remedies: A state can sue the government in federal court over a disputed law, just as Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott did, challenging the EPA's designation of carbon dioxide as a pollutant.

 

Mr. BOB MOSER (Editor, The Texas Observer): You know, we have this cyclical re-emergence of people who want to declare states' rights in American history. And the actual history of what's happened when those things have happened seems to escape them, and made reference to 1957, when President Eisenhower ordered federal troops to escort nine black students into Little Rock Central High when the Arkansas governor rejected the Supreme Court ruling to integrate public schools.

 

What does the next State Budget look like?

 

Last week, the state’s Legislative Budget Board predicted a deficit estimate of between $15 billion and $18 billion for the 2012-13 biennium.  The latest projection by the Chair of Appropriatios is $18B.  The Governor, Speaker & Lt. Gov. have already directed agencies to cut spending by 5% during the current budget period.  During the upcoming budget period of FY 2012-13, there will have to be deeper spending cuts.  There is talk of using most or all of the “Rainy Day Fund” which I’m told should have about $8 billion in it by then.  Using the Rainy Day Fund to ease part of the pressure makes some sense.  To use all of it would probably be a mistake. 

 

To make up the difference, there will need to be deep budget cuts.  On the Senate side, the Chair of Senate Finance talking about eliminating some of the current sales tax exemptions.  On the House side, the Appropriations Chair is talking about considering the expansion of gambling to raise the revenue.

$2.6 billion of funds for the 2010-2011 budget came from revenues unspent during the 2008-09 budget and rolled into the 2010-11 account.

Then there was a $3 billion surplus brought about by school finance reform that was put into the state’s “property tax relief” fund to help pay for public schools. )

A dip in sales taxes already has caused a $1 billion drop in expected revenues during the first nine months of the current fiscal year that began last September, and one economist is forecasting an eventual deficit of $3.5 billion less revenue than predicted for that area of the two-year budget.

Along with more people — mostly children and seniors — enrolling in Medicaid and increased health care costs for the state’s employees, retirees and prison population, it is expected such costs will add as much as $2.5 billion to the state’s 2012-13 expenditure.

The not so bad news is that there’s about $9 billion in its Rainy Day Fund, which lawmakers left untouched during the 81st legislative session last year, but oil and gas prices are volatile, and if you look at the four biennium, preceding the one we’re in, it has not been a very filled up fund and it has not always been as large as it has been.  Going forward. It may take quite some time to replenish that fund depending upon how much we use to fill the gaps in the next budget.

“It takes a two-thirds vote of the House and Senate to use Rainy Day Fund money, so it will take Republicans and Democrats working together.  Needless to say, members of the Legislature are going to be forced to make a lot of tough decisions during the 82nd Session.

 

BORDER SECURITY.

 

Department of Public Safety Director Col. Steve McCraw recently outlined some of the challenges, including trying to coordinate efforts among dozens of state agencies and hundreds of local government entities.  He noted that the state has seen a shift in illegal crossings from individuals seeking work . . . to well-organized “gangs” engaging in drug and human smuggling, which makes border protection more difficult and more dangerous.

Despite the challenges, Texas is unique among the states in recognizing the need for increased patrols as a deterrent to homeland security threats.

Texas has taken the lead on this issue and is well positioned like no other state to continue addressing homeland and border security.  With only about five years of experience under our belt, we have made great strides in tightening the most porous areas throughout the state to protect our citizens from a variety of threats.

Earlier in May, the House Committee on Appropriations heard testimony regarding new helicopters, drone jets with infrared capabilities to patrol the border, and recent federal grant funding for homeland security efforts.  The state has received over $200 million in federal Byrne Justice Assistance Grants since 2005. This money is split between the state and local governments and provides funding for border security, port security, the drug war, combating international gangs, and bioterrorism research, among other items.

 

The state has also put significant amounts of general revenue into support for local and state law enforcement agencies responsible for protecting the Texas-Mexico border area in terms of manpower and necessary equipment.  We provided funds to support Operation Linebacker in November 2005, and additional funds to support Operation Rio Grande in 2006.   Then we put $110 million from the 2007 Texas Legislature to support ongoing border security operations in Texas.


The state has encouraged information sharing in many ways, including the support of two key initiatives: the Texas Data Exchange (TDEx) and LiveScan, as well as the establishment of the Texas Fusion Center, the Border Security Operations Center and Joint Operations Intelligence Centers in each border security sector along the Texas-Mexico border.  Each of these initiatives facilitates the sharing of critical information among local, state and federal law enforcement agencies.

 

We will continue to urge the federal government to defend our country's borders, but at the same time, Texas will continue to take the lead among border states in protecting our citizens.


We know that one of the greatest criminal and terrorist threats to the state is a porous Texas-Mexico border, has taken action to place law enforcement resources in the border region to curb the exploitation of unsecured areas by Mexican crime cartels, transnational gangs and would-be terrorists.  These efforts have resulted in a significant decrease in crime in the border region and an increased sense of security by residents of border communities.

 

Texas has had to take action because of the lack of enforcement on the part of the federal government, where the responsibility really lies. 

 

 

Action / Initiative

Border security is vital to the safety of every region in Texas and the nation, and our state has been putting “boots on the ground” in border counties since 2005.

 

And as I mentioned before, efforts were enhanced in 2006, with continued efforts to implement a strategy of launching a series of border security operations that increased the law enforcement presence along the border; centralized border-related intelligence; unified local, state and federal land, air and water patrol resources; and committed Texas Military Forces assets and leveraged new technologies along the border.

 

During the 80th Texas Legislative Session that $110 million was dedicated for continued border security.

 

Technology used to secure Texas’ border include:

·        License plate readers

·        A Virtual Border Watch capability to deter criminal activity

·        The latest electronic fingerprint technology at all booking stations

·        Portable electronic fingerprint readers

·        Radio Interoperability in the border region and key corridors

·        The Texas Data Exchange to enable border wide crime mapping and statewide link analysis capabilities

Since these operations began in Texas, serious crime along the smuggling corridors of the state has been significantly reduced.   However, the effort to secure our border is never complete.   It requires constant intelligence, coordination and efforts by law enforcement to prevent and deter criminal activity.  Our adversaries are ruthless, highly adaptive, well-funded, and committed to penetrating our border. Success is dependent on our ability to sustain operations and quickly adapt to thwart new tactics employed by the Mexican organized crime cartels, including their use of gangs and truck drivers in drug and human smuggling operations.  Texas will continue to seek new and innovative solutions to increase our law enforcement capabilities to protect all Texans and our nation.

 

Just the other day, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Friday gave approval to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to begin the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) along the southwest Texas border beginning June 1, 2010.  And the Governor has asked for 1,000 National Guard troops to help patrol the Texas border.

 

 

Is it possible that Texas might do an Arizona on illegal's?

We will undoubtedly look at it.  Every session we have bills filed to create more/better enforcement of immigration laws in Texas.  The problem is that Democrats fight these bills and are joined in their opposition by much of the rural caucus (many of whom are Republican) who represent large farming concerns who rely on the cheap labor provided by undocumented workers.

 

Regarding its “odds” for passing, we can look to some comments made by some state leaders. 

 

Gov. Perry has expressed concerns about a few provisions of the Arizona bill, and stated “Our focus must continue to be on the criminal elements involved with conducting criminal acts against Texans and their property," Perry said in a press release.

 

In his official statement on the question, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst never said whether he agrees or disagrees with the Arizona law.  He said, "I understand the frustration of the people of Arizona with the federal government's failure to secure our borders and stop illegal immigration, drug trafficking and dangerous transnational gangs coming across from Mexico. Texans are frustrated too... While Texas is doing its part, I think the federal government should do theirs by dramatically increasing the number of border patrol agents to secure our borders once and for all."

 

The state's attorney general will have to enforce whatever the Legislature and the governor decide to do Attorney General Greg Abbott hit all the talking points, spanking the feds, noting legal concerns with the new law, and saying the state will protect you. "The Federal Government's primary job is to protect our borders and the safety of our citizens — and they aren't getting the job done," Abbott said in a press release. "Even President Obama acknowledged that Arizona acted out of frustration because of the federal government's failures. There are legitimate concerns with the Arizona law and while those are sorted out, Texas will continue demanding that the federal government stop dithering while Texans' safety is at stake.  In the meantime, Texas is redoubling its efforts to provide resources — including personnel and technology — to protect Texans and secure our border."

 

Agriculture Commissioner Todd Staples didn't respond to requests for comment. But his opponent, Democrat Hank Gilbert, said the Arizona law would be expensive for people in agriculture.  "If you want to talk about driving up food costs, slashing tax revenues, and damaging our economy, then Leo Berman's bill is exactly what you want," Gilbert said. "I cannot imagine someone proposing something so irresponsible or damaging to Texas agriculture." "The fact of the matter is this: undocumented immigrants make up a significant segment of the agricultural labor force in Texas. These men and women help Texas grow food not just for our state, but also for the rest of the nation. If you take away their ability to move freely within our society and survive without being under constant threat of police action, they will go somewhere else for jobs," Gilbert said.

 

The new anti-immigration law signed into law by Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer continues to generate a firestorm of comments, polls, protests and debates. While some question the constitutionality of the new legislation, others think that the federal government's inaction on the question of immigration has left the states with very few options. Texas lawmakers have spoken out for and against the Arizona law, and are some are speaking up about their plans to introduce similar measures when the Legislature convenes in January. Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball, told the Houston Chronicle that she introduced a similar bill in the last legislative session and plans to do so again in the upcoming session next year. Meanwhile protests marches organized by various civil rights groups have been planned or have taken place in Dallas, San Antonio and Austin. Other groups are promoting an economic boycott of Arizona, posing potential damage to the state's recovering tourism industry.

 

• Border violence continues to plague the El Paso-Juarez area. The El Paso Times reports that four men were gunned down outside a supermarket in Juarez on Tuesday, and five more were killed in an attack at a Juarez home. This follows news that seven police officers were attacked on Friday after stopping to help a man who flagged them down. A bystander was also killed in that attack. Although five men were arrested in the slayings of the police officers, they claim to have taken orders from the two who remain at large. The raging drug cartel war shows no signs of slowing as the total number killed since 2008 now tops 5000.

 

Meeting ended at 10:30am per schedule.  

            

USE THIS NAVIGATION BAR TO VIEW THIS WEBSITE (updated January 2007)
Home Agenda & Minutes Contact Us
15 Cities & Other Links Mission Over 50 - Do You Know? If you have an item, submit it to the webmaster for inclusion here
Texas Homestead Property Tax Freeze
Background  Goals  Link to Freeze Status throughout Texas at TSHL
Petition Form Sample Tax Freeze Request Suggested Approach In Your City or County
Texas Constitution Change Tax Petition Advise  Tax Relief Needed
 
Contact Sam McCollough, the webmaster, at sam4912zzz@tx.rr.com or 817-283-1002 for questions about this website.